Skip to main content

The Fools of Kenosha

National Review

So why the rioting? We are told frequently these days that rioting represents the only course that many Americans have available to them. We reject this view entirely. ..The best course of action is to resist weaving every ugly incident into an all-encompassing worldview that, in the name of highlighting what is bad about America, serves to blot out all that is good.

Dems Strain to Depict Biden as a Moderate

National Review

There is obviously no percentage in him running as the most progressive presidential nominee in a couple of generations. It’s much better for him to portray himself simply as a good guy whose tent is so broad it stretches from AOC to the former secretary of state for a Republican president many progressives think was guilty of war crimes.

CNN Reporter’s “Analysis” of Kamala Is One Long Press Release

National Review

Maeve Reston, national political “reporter” for CNN, has published a string of glowing stories in the wake of Biden’s selection of Kamala Harris as his running mate, marking a stark departure from her treatment of Sarah Palin’s 2008 run. Reston, who frequently publishes “analysis” pieces for CNN that are not cast as opinion, has been unrelenting in her praise for the Harris pick.

Kamala Is No Moderate

National Review

Joe Biden’s vice-presidential pick is a self-serving and dishonest politico…She was moderately corrupt as an attorney general, moderately abusive as a senator, and now moderately dangerous to the rule of law. Americans should be moderately terrified.

Politics Puts the NFL on the Brink

National Review

If the multibillion-dollar NFL decides that multimillionaire players have no obligation to stand to honor a collective national anthem, and that there will be separate anthems and politicized uniforms, then millions of Americans will quietly shrug and change the channel. And that silent protest will make the 2016–17 anthem protest look like child’s play.

Bari Weiss and Malignancy at the NY Times

National Review

Intellectual curiosity — let alone risk-taking — is now a liability at The Times. Why edit something challenging to our readers, or write something bold only to go through the numbing process of making it ideologically kosher, when we can assure ourselves of job security (and clicks) by publishing our 4000th op-ed arguing that Donald Trump is a unique danger to the country and the world?